Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tearfully Beautiful


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. None of the arguments made to keep the article are persuasive as applicable to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines around notability Daniel (talk) 12:37, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Tearfully Beautiful

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSONG. This is a one-off song performed one time at a year-end awards ceremony by a one-off collaboration of kpop performers. Allkpop is used to claim it helped boost the show's ratings. All other sources are primary and don't go toward establishing notability. I don't see how a detailed article can ever be written about this and therefore don't see how it can ever pass the high standards of WP:NSONG. Shinyang-i (talk) 19:46, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. Shinyang-i (talk) 20:12, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  21:12, 25 January 2015 (UTC)


 * keep:this song is the Gaon Chart Hot 100 in December,while was realease At the end of the month,and this song was realease december 26 tearfully beautiful,while this performance in sbs gayo daejun was december 29 and this song the top 100 of gaon single chart ,download chart and bgm chart similar other song thus this song is Independent of performance,So prominent is Like a other korean song in wikipedia with refrence gaon chart,keep it (سعيدس (talk) 22:30, 25 January 2015 (UTC))
 * comment I'm sorry, I don't really understand what you mean? Keep it because it charted?  200 songs chart every week on Gaon; W:NSONG requires far in excess of this for a song to be notable. Shinyang-i (talk) 00:04, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Shinyang-i:This article is notable,Since this is a notable song,with top chart and billiboard and is False your comment About song history,this song is Independent of tv show and was realease beafore the show and is not a cover song,however is enough my elucidation for this article,Decides wikipedia administrator (سعيدس (talk) 01:08, 26 January 2015 (UTC))
 * keep:this article is valid With respect to Terms of Wikipedia (Mrchurang (talk) 18:29, 26 January 2015 (UTC))
 * I'm sorry but could you clarify what you mean? Shinyang-i (talk) 23:06, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete: Not a notable single, does not have any real merit (ie: Awards, Charting, etc.) and is lacking promotion outside of SBS Projection - "The Color of KPOP". Tibbydibby (talk) 01:59, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Shinyang-i :keep this because I've studied Korean article about the song in wikipedia,i see in article [Be Natural] this song is not top chart and notable song,but this song have page in wikipedia Because this song have Music recognition
 * and Many of the song are no performance but notable in Specified time interval,Tearfully BeautifulAlthough Was made by SBS projaction but this Sources indicate This track is well known and As a Song occasion was recognized and Was known as a hot track in December.(Mrchurang (talk) 02:06, 31 January 2015 (UTC))
 * You cannot vote twice. Please edit your comment to remove the additional "keep" vote. Shinyang-i (talk) 03:52, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.