Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tears of a Tiger


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:44, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Tears of a Tiger

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced, promotional, non-notable, over-emphasis on plot. Also nominating the following related novels, which are sequels to this novel:
 * --L235 (talk) Ping when replying 18:40, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  Rcsprinter123     (tell)  @ 20:22, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 14:03, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 14:03, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Comment: I'm finding some academic sourcing for the first book (like this one) but just in case the coverage is predominantly on the first one, I am debating just making a series page that merges the information together as opposed to a page for just the first book. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   15:34, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep all. This Amazon.com linkWebCite for Tears of a Tiger lists reviews from Publishers Weekly, School Library Journal, and Booklist. This Amazon.com linkWebCite for Forged by Fire (novel) lists reviews from Publishers Weekly, School Library Journal, and Booklist. This Amazon.com linkWebCite for Darkness Before Dawn lists reviews from School Library Journal and Booklist. There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Tears of a Tiger, Forged by Fire (novel), and Darkness Before Dawn to pass Notability, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". Cunard (talk) 06:05, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:59, 9 January 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, N ORTH A MERICA 1000 01:48, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.