Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teaz N Pleaz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 02:07, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Teaz N Pleaz

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

NN business with 0 G News stories and only trivial (Facebook, Myspace, address info) on G Search, plus according to the page, they only have 2 employees. C T J F 8 3 chat 18:15, 28 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Speedy deletion. Non-notable and unimportant. De728631 (talk) 19:07, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Already declined, I've asked the admin for their reasoning.  C T J F 8 3  chat 19:12, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Which was a claim of a "great impact" (since withdrawn) and 2 newspapers, enough to avoid speedy delete. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:39, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Also note that there's no particularly assertion of notability. It's not some sort of national chain. For a small local business that doesn't have profits/reach to get notability through that route, there ought to be some sort of landmark status for it. I mean something remarkable longevity, meeting place for famous figures, etc. This is a really young business, with no showing of any special status that override its modest size. --JamesAM (talk) 20:18, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, 2 stories in local media doesn't make it encyclopedically notable. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:27, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:36, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.