Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tebahism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Alberto Frigo. J04n(talk page) 20:03, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Tebahism

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I very much doubt that the subject is in any way notable, and the listing of dead individuals such as August Sander as belonging to the 'movement' really sets of the (polite word) nonsense detector bells ringing. Whether the perpetrator, one Alberto Frigo is notable is, of course, another matter. If there is any substance to this movement I am sure it can be contained in the biog. TheLongTone (talk) 16:22, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

While editing the Alberto Frigo wiki page I realized that the discussion revolving around his Tebahism idea was way too long to include within it. I therefore begun sourcing out what he meant with it. Alas i am not done going through his publication and exhibitions he has curated with contemporary artists on the subject. I think I can improve this tomorrow, or do you or anyone have other recommendations? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Turekka (talk • contribs) 18:40, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Jack Frost (talk) 06:01, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spirituality-related deletion discussions. Jack Frost (talk) 06:01, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

I have done more research and updated the page with further references. There more work to be done however and I do get TheLongTone comment concerning whether or not to use the word 'movement'. One could better use the word 'phenomenon' or 'theoretical framework' however it came to my mind that Outsider Art is also a movement where artists are not enlisting to. The association with a movement might occur posthumously. Tebahism in this respect is a valuable way to look at artistic practices especially from a media standpoint. I am trying to do further reading on the subject. There is a confusion of terms life-stowing, minor data, self-tracking etc. but will try to pursue the research as I find it a valuable way to look into present and past art. I have other reading on my list. Turekka (talk) 10:22, 23 January 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Killiondude (talk) 06:08, 30 January 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens (talk) 00:16, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete and redirect to Alberto Frigo where this is covered. Reads like patent nonsense, which is perhaps the point because of art and so forth, but the nonsensicality of the content makes it very difficult to determine any notability. Certainly there don't seem to be any obvious reliable sources associated with this topic. Google throws up only stuff related to Frigo and deleted Wikipedia articles.  Sandstein   09:44, 14 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.