Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tech2Buzz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:08, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Tech2Buzz

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article about an unremarkable company with no claim to notability other than claims about website hits. A web search turned up no reliable sources. Psychonaut (talk) 17:07, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 23:30, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 23:30, 10 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 03:27, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 18:47, 26 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - Start up article for a start up company with insufficient news coverage or third-party sources in that matter. Searches at Google News and several Indian newspapers failed to provide anything good except for The Hindu which only mentions the company briefly this. Note that the news article is from July 2013 and this Wikipedia article was created almost a month ago so it may emphasize how new this company is. In a large country like India, there are probably thousands of tech companies but I doubt all of them are successful or notable and there isn't seem to be anything indicating Tech2Buzz has been hugely successful or notable. No prejudice towards userfying or a future article. SwisterTwister   talk  20:37, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.