Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TechEmpower


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 05:51, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

TechEmpower

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable organization that does not satisfy WP:CORP. A before search conducted shows the organization lacks in-depth significant coverage in independent secondary reliable sources. Majority of information found are in primary sources. Celestina007 (talk) 14:39, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

I'm the author of the article and I'm not affiliated with TechEmpower in any way, I'm just following the Framework Benchmarks. Here's a couple of points: Hope this helps. Rivanvx (talk) 16:04, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
 * ServerCentral covers them here https://www.servercentral.com/case-study-techempower/
 * Apress published this book https://www.apress.com/gp/book/9781484235188 that cites their benchmark results
 * Red Hat cites their results here https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2018/07/24/improv-net-core-kestrel-performance-linux/
 * DZone article https://dzone.com/articles/five-facts-you-might-not-know-about-techempower-fr
 * Finally, Microsoft links to the benchmark in their company-only URL shortener https://aka.ms/techempower
 * Other metrics:
 * 5K stars on the framework benchmarks repository on GitHub https://github.com/TechEmpower/FrameworkBenchmarks
 * The Framework Benchmarks are frequently discussed on Reddit, HN and varius forums, e.g. https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/cbgv6f/rust_async_frameworks_dominate_techempower/ https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/7xr7cr/techempower_web_framework_benchmark_round_15/ https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17254152 https://forum.phalcon.io/discussion/17988/techempower-benchmarks-218


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 14:39, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 14:39, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 14:39, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 14:39, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 14:39, 1 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fails WP:GNG - I tried quite hard to find some decent citations for this, but... when all five refs in the article are the company's own website it never bodes well. In the bin with this one. -- a they/them &#124; argue &#124; contribs 21:42, 1 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.