Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Technical-Vocational Teaching Approach


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:24, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Technical-Vocational Teaching Approach

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Description of the page author's unpublished masters degree project with no assertion of notability per WP:GNG and WP:NOR. Following proposed deletion, a "Related Literature" section was added in this edit, but there's nothing in these references mentioning this teaching approach by name, and the whole section appears to be WP:SYNTHESIS of existing published material which doesn't support the notability of the approach described in the first section. I can't see anything here that can be merged to Vocational education, Constructivism (learning theory) or Science education. Scopecreep (talk) 05:39, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Scopecreep (talk) 05:39, 11 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - There is no coverage about this technique to establish notability. Merging this material anywhere would be a bad idea as this dissertation represents original reasearch. -- Whpq (talk) 16:37, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 17:45, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, → B  music  ian  00:08, 27 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete No independent sources. Because educational theories and techniques often have multiple names, I did some searching on Google to see if there was another term for the Technical-Vocational Teaching Approach.  I could not find any example of teaching chemistry as a way of learning a vocation, which is what this article is discussing.  I agree with Whpq that this is original reasearch, which of course is also not verifiable. NJ Wine (talk) 03:11, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence of notability. But I don't think this is OR, but rather a discussion from somewhere we haven't been able to locate.  DGG ( talk ) 08:25, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.