Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Technical 0812


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was deleted and locked. (non-admin closure) — HELL KNOWZ   ▎TALK 11:04, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

Technical 0812

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A company that does not come close to meeting WP:NCORP. Barkeep49 (talk) 17:39, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Barkeep49 (talk) 17:39, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Barkeep49 (talk) 17:39, 22 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete per A7 or G11 as the article is currently tagged. Otherwise, still delete as a clear fail of NCORP. Eddie891 Talk Work 18:10, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment - User:Drmies, User:Barkeep49 - It looks as if the two of you edit-conflicted trying to get rid of this.  Robert McClenon (talk) 18:12, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Great minds... Drmies (talk) 20:18, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - Does not meet corporate notability. I have a template for this for drafts, but this is not a draft.  Robert McClenon (talk) 18:12, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: A new article describing a subsidiary of OneYear Technologies, which itself has no article. Being one of many partners of an online safety initiative is not inherently notable and I am seeing no evidence of attained notability. AllyD (talk) 06:40, 23 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.