Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Technical Analysis Software (Finance)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Belongs at WP:RFD. Fixed copy-n-paste move by deleting target & doing a proper move. -- JLaTondre 11:57, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Technical Analysis Software (Finance)
Contents moved to technical analysis software. Vanity now. A redirect is not necessary either. I'm not too sure if a speedy deletion is more appropriate in this case. Please advise. --Wai Wai (talk) 06:03, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete. I believe both CSD G6 and R3 would work in this case. tmopkisn tlka 06:26, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as a redirect. Not a speedy - the edit history needs to be maintained here. --JJay 10:23, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment is this redirect really valuable? Needed? WilyD 13:29, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Not as far as I'm concerned, the only reason the parentheses are used in an article title is when a previous article with the same title exists. Since they would both have the same content I really don't think it would be necessary to have it even as a redirect. tmopkisn tlka 19:53, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
 * It is standard practice to maintain the edit history. The content has been moved. Therefore, this needs to remain as a redirect. --JJay 19:55, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Hmm... couldn't actually move the page, and then restore to the version it's supposed to be on.... and then delete the redirect. because honestly, this seems to be a very pointless redirect. tmopkisn tlka 06:07, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Knowing who contributed information to the articles and when they did it is more important than whether this will be used as a redirect. Also redirects should be discussed on WP:RFD not AfD. --JJay 10:53, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.