Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Technical Challenges of Quantum Computers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge into Quantum computer. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 01:12, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Technical Challenges of Quantum Computers

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Blatant how to content. Perhaps suitable for Wikiversity or Wikihow. Beeblbrox (talk) 20:18, 26 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep a very general discussion. Anyone whowants to build one relying on the information here alone will be rather disappointed. DGG (talk) 20:46, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete "Here is an instruction to quantum computing." And here is a policy that says we don't do instructions. Guy (Help!) 22:08, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
 * read the article, not the sentence. Bad choice of words, just change to "This article describes the general methods underlying quantum computing." Or propose something of your own ion the talk page, and dont try to delete every article with a poor choice of wording. If an article can be improved, we're here to improve it, or at least that's what the deletion policy says.DGG (talk) 02:22, 27 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - in no way is this an encyclopedia article; fails WP:NOTGUIDE. Biruitorul Talk 23:24, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong keep OK, so people don't like the writing style so we delete? The how-to manual style of the article isn't a reason to delete.  It is simply not written in the form we'd like.  The topic is notable, of serious research interest, and the article, while not well written seems to cover the most relevant issues.  I personally know three faculty members at a top 15 research institution who work in this area and there are a fair number of papers published on this exact topic in top-end conferences and journals. Hobit (talk) 00:37, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge what data we can into Quantum Computing. I fail to see how this topic is separate and merits a different article. RayAYang (talk) 04:07, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge into quantum computing. Yeah, the author wrote it in the wrong style, but that doesn't make it a how-to. This may neatly merge into that page as its own section or it may require rearranging, but it has useful information. MacMog (talk) 05:40, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge per comments above. — Hex    (❝  ?!  ❞)   15:10, 27 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Strong Keep per comments above QuantumShadow (talk) 14:53, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep I created the page, because there are many different techniques for quantum computing. This page is just at its beginning, it should give an overview over the techniques and how the process is going on. It is the result of a seminar i had on my university. I am not shure if its good to merge it to the quantum computing page because it would grow the next days. And of course i would be glad if anyone who knows something about this subject can modify the page or just, if he is a better writer, replace it. And sorry if it is not written correctly it is my first wiki page, i will look, how similar pages are written Andhoh —Preceding undated comment was added at 17:40, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge into quantum computing and then after proper cleanup and copyediting spin-off these sections, which are too long. This article definitely consists of lot of useful and encyclopedic information, but I don't see how to avoid serious overlapping with the quantum computing in current article without going through merge and spin-off procedures.Beagel (talk) 19:09, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge with quantum computing. This is very useful information, but doesn't need its own page.  J kasd  06:44, 30 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.