Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Technical Presentation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 09:18, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Technical Presentation

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Reads like a dictionary article, has WP:Original Research issues that have not been addressed in 10 years Willy No1lakersfan (Talk - Edits) 00:26, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Willy No1lakersfan (Talk - Edits) 00:26, 24 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Mccapra (talk) 14:22, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. North America1000 16:10, 24 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete as a personal essay without clear encyclopedic value. There are plenty of how-to guides on this topic on the web and in books, but I'd support deleting what we have here with WP:TNT. With any luck, someone will see the redlink and start fresh. Ajpolino (talk) 18:25, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
 * What redlink? This page is an orphan so there will be literally nothing left behind if it is deleted. SpinningSpark 20:57, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete One can give a presentation in a variety of ways but that doesn't mean a technical format is a notable encyclopedic topic. Reywas92Talk 19:38, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
 * It doesn't mean it isn't notable either. I'm still thinking about this one, but there are arguably enough book sources on the subject (e.g. Technical Writing & Presentation) to at least make a case for notability. That leaves deletion resting on a TNT argument.  Of the four paragraphs, paras three and four have citations.  Para two makes some rather inocuous assertions that I can't believe anyone would challenge.  Most of para one is much the same except that I would question whether "classroom instruction" comes under this umbrella.  That is something rather different, usually called "training" in my book.  So the TNT argument is weak, although some cleanup is called for, and I am leaning to keep. SpinningSpark 14:22, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
 * A merge to the surprisingly short Presentation would also work. Of course we can find sources about giving a technical presentation but this still uses rather general terms and a separate page is not necessary. Reywas92Talk 17:44, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:25, 26 June 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.