Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Technitrous


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete -- JForget  22:55, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Technitrous

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Advertisement DimaG (talk) 21:17, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete or reduce to stub . Possibly an acceptable article could be written about this subject, but at present it is exactly as the nominator says, an advertisement. —SlamDiego&#8592;T 07:43, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: Since the author has expended the effort to falsify my statement of opinion and to detag the article, but not to genuinely improve it, I conclude that it is unsalvageable. —SlamDiego&#8592;T 19:34, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Non-notable event that currently is only an advertisment. -- Blake  01  07:59, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Can be useful Since this is an IT related topic one can know a little bit about from this topic — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.165.191.232 (talk • contribs)
 * Comment: I draw attention to the attempt by 59.165.191.232 to falsify my statement of opinion. —SlamDiego&#8592;T 19:17, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Author name suggests COI. Adevrt. No attempt to provide evidence of notability. &mdash; RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 20:53, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete The fact that User:Technitrous deleted the AfD template doesn't help this case either. Notability, COI and verification problems do this article in. Themfromspace (talk) 18:48, 30 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.