Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Techno-organic material


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 22:42, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Techno-organic material

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable concept. I was unable to find any independent reliable sources which describe techno-organic material in fiction via GoogleBooks/Scholar/search. Claritas § 17:13, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete In the Marvel Universe... Nope. There are articles about fictitious materials and other sci-fi related stuff, maybe this fits in one of those. And gods, it's completely unsourced so it's nothing more than WP:OR. § FreeRangeFrog croak 20:08, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:32, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:32, 16 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran  talk to me! 05:37, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

 
 * I had a quick search for sources when this first came up. I didn't find anything describing this as a coherent concept, either.  The WWW page by Soleil Lapierre, hyperlinked-to by the article, contains various "it is not known" and "presumably"s, indicating that there isn't really anything even in the underlying fiction describing this, before going off to discuss transformers technology instead. Uncle G (talk) 06:56, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 01:29, 24 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete: per the above, as original... er, potential future research. הסרפד (Hasirpad) [formerly Ratz...bo] 20:23, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete: no reliable third party sources that sigifniciantly cover this topic. If we can't WP:verify notability of the concept, we typically delete it. Shooterwalker (talk) 19:20, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per failing notability and even verifiability. Cavarrone (talk) 06:17, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.