Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Techno Gamerz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 13:49, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Ujjwal Chaurasia

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Promotional piece of a non notable YouTuber sourced to press releases. Having x number of subscribers on YouTube doesn't make anyone notable by default. The article was previously declined by JavaHurricane at AfC due to lack of independent coverage and was later deleted as WP:G7. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 15:53, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 15:53, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 15:53, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 15:53, 13 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete puff piece Dexxtrall (talk) 17:46, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello there respected editors thanks for your concern about an article written by me it's about very famous YouTuber and Media Personality Techno Gamerz, and I have gone through all the instructions mentioned by you and have cited many references and I think this page should not be deleted because it's about one of the biggest Indian Gamer and YouTuber and I think he is very notable and I humbly request you to please remove this tag also I want to tell you that last time when this page was created by someone else it lacked information but this time I have gone through all the instructions thoroughly, And about reliable sources, so I just want to tell you that many reliable newspapers and websites have published many articles about Techno Gamerz for example-The Indian Express, The Economic Times, and India.com etc. Thank you very much for your time. Yours Sincerely Pranay Dongre 27  (talk) 2:36, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per nom and A7. &mdash;  A.A Prinon  Leave a dialogue 06:28, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Clear delete: no evidence of notability. A mystery how this was moved from AfC... PK650 (talk) 01:16, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete No indication of nobility. Just promotional. Should have been CSD. 'News' articles are just sponsored content. RationalPuff (talk) 15:38, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Don't delete: As per directed by Umakant Bhalerao I have provided 3 Citations/references which should meet the criteria for notablity the three of them are-Republic World, India.com and The Indian Express. Pranay Dongre 27 (talk) 03:48, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep: It passes the WP:GNG and is covered by reliable sources. I didn't look at some of the sources properly, which are promotional posts. ––  𝚅𝚁𝙹 𝙱𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚑𝚞  09:54, 23 June 2021 (UTC) ––  𝚅𝚁𝙹  𝙱𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚑𝚞  05:31, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete and salt, promoted for months on Wikipedia by multiple sockpuppets of at least one, possibly two paid editing outfits. As for how it was moved from AfC – it never went through an AfC review, and if it had, it definitely wouldn't have passed. --bonadea contributions talk 20:20, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete and salt per Bonadea.4meter4 (talk) 22:28, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete for all of the above reasons, which generally seem right on the mark to me. DocFreeman24 (talk) 00:18, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt: promotional article, notability not established. MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:43, 24 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.