Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Technochrist


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 05:35, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Technochrist

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Google search and GNews search generate no significant coverage of this DJ whatsoever (and what coverage there is appears not to be wholly independent). Article seems to be an autobiography. Bongo matic  23:15, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Insufficent notability. But I hope he has terrific success and becomes famous. ChildofMidnight (talk) 01:20, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: insufficient independent 3rd party coverage WP:MUSICBIO. JamesBurns (talk) 08:47, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Extend debate per Talk:Technochrist for a couple of days. Bearian (talk) 01:51, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Why? Last edit to article other than tagging was 21 January. Request for non-deletion was 10 February. AfD put up on 16 February. Seems like ample opportunity to improve / provide references, especially as the author is the subject, so would presumably be aware of any coverage received. Bongo  matic  02:25, 20 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton Tropical  Cyclone  02:08, 21 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - no evidence of current musical notability, but subject to re-creation later on. No improvement, nor evidence, proferred in past several days. Bearian (talk) 04:47, 23 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.