Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Technocratic views of the Price system


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus to delete, defaulting to keep (non-admin closure). AfD is not a forum for discussing proposed merges; that posiblity is left open to editors fo the article and its talkpage. Skomorokh 13:10, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Technocratic views of the Price system

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

A self-sourced and essentially unreferenced discussion of the views of the Technocracy movement on the price system. No evidence that this is significant outside of said movement, or that their views on the "Price system" (itself a neologism for economic policy) is considered significant in isolation. Guy (Help!) 13:03, 6 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Merge and Redirect to Technocracy movement, which is where this content belongs; primary sources are fine for these sorts of statements and articles. Celarnor Talk to me  13:13, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect as per Celarnor. This information would be more useful and better explained as part of the larger article rather than on its own. ~ mazca talk 13:17, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge per Celarnor to the article suggested, or to the Technical Alliance or Technocracy Incorporated articles. Mandsford (talk) 16:34, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - This information may already be covered in the Technocracy Incorporated article pretty much now. skip sievert (talk) 17:32, 6 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment - I can't really defend this particular article as it was only really created as a split from Price system, when there were arguments there about content. However "Guy" if you are intending to just go around deleting or merging all of the Technocracy related articles, then you obviously aren't taking into account length. If this is merged into Technocracy movement (which I suppose it can be), that article is going to get really big, really fast, and then people will be talking about splitting sections off into separate articles and so on, till we end up here again. I think you've got to understand that if something is relevant in an article, but there is no room in that article for the large amount of content that there is to write about it, then it needs it's own article. BTW who exactly is going to be doing the merging? Shall I assume that job falls to me? --Hibernian (talk) 01:09, 7 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Sure. be bold.  I don't know enough about to subject matter to properly merge such things; I'm just here to keep things from getting deleted that don't deserve it.  :)  Celarnor Talk to me  01:18, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

I was thinking merge.. but after looking at Technocracy Incorporated article and Technocracy movement article... it seems to me that pertinent information is probably already covered in those articles and associated wikipedia pages concerning this subject. skip sievert (talk) 01:33, 7 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.