Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Technological University of Pereira School of Chemistry


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Unquestionably not notable, & I don't think there is anything worth merging  DGG ( talk ) 01:22, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Technological University of Pereira School of Chemistry

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

This page does not fulfil WP:ORG and WP:IRS Delete Andremun (talk) 01:37, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colombia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:05, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:05, 22 April 2012 (UTC)


 * It could be a copyvio also. The introduction looks like a direct translation of the mission page on the web site in the infobox, but my spanish is terrible. Can someone else check this? -- Bduke   (Discussion)  22:21, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Following suggestion of Bduke, checked the web page for information. It is not copyvio. But there is none of the information in the article on any of the web pages linked. Andremun (talk) 08:46, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 29 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per past AfD precedent: almost all individuals academic programs are deleted at AfD. Bearian (talk) 17:42, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete and Merge important info into Technological University of Pereira article if any WP:RS can be found. WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES and WP:UNIGUIDE argue for deletion of separate article unless the school is especially notable separate from the parent university.  Article fails WP:ORG so a separate article isn't justified. DocTree (talk) 05:18, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per Doctree above. Also note the big copyvio concerns listed near the top. Lord Roem (talk) 17:31, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.