Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Technology Concepts & Design Inc


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 19:40, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Technology Concepts & Design Inc

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

My several searches found absolutely nothing (aside from a few links here) to suggest this can be improved with good sources or is notable. The article has been added since July 2007 but never actually significantly improved and I strongly suspect this was COI editing which I wouldn't mind as much if it was a good article but it never has. SwisterTwister  talk  04:36, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:18, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:18, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:18, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:18, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:18, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:18, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - Spammy B2B software company article of unclear notability. Refs provided are incomplete, mostly unverifiable, and rife with press release and promo content. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric (talk) 18:57, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95  Talk  14:02, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - just one of many e-discovery firms. No reliable sources are referenced.--Rpclod (talk) 03:28, 18 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.