Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Technology Connections

Technology Connections

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I follow this channel and had the redlink watchlisted, so I was cautiously optimistic to see it turn blue. But unfortunately I don't think it's reached notability yet. The existing sources are all primary links to the channel itself, and a BEFORE search for others turned up only interviews on other YouTube channels I wouldn't consider sufficiently reliable (e.g., a one-paragraph entry at that's borderline for SIGCOV, and short summaries of videos like  that either aren't SIGCOV or aren't RS or both.  Sdkb   talk 00:28, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education,  and Technology.  Sdkb   talk 00:34, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
 * weak keep: I'm a fan of his youtube channel, but it's hard to find things about it. This seems like a RS, a few hits in The Verge which is a RS , and this which I think is also a RS . We probably have at least enough for a basic article about this person, or the youtube channel he hosts. Oaktree b (talk) 00:47, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete I am also a fan of his YouTube channel but the sources provided thus far are not sufficient to meet WP:GNG. ElKevbo (talk) 00:59, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Internet,  and Illinois.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  02:30, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately weak delete. The DigitalCameraWorld source above is the only one that qualifies for a full unit of SIGCOV, while the rest don't quite meet the mark, even when combined. Aaron Liu  (talk) 21:10, 18 July 2024 (UTC)