Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Technology Evaluation Centers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:23, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Technology Evaluation Centers

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not enough coverage in independent third-party sources to satisfy WP:GNG. Note first (and only relevant) Google Books listing is a reprint of the Wikipedia article. Brianhe (talk) 17:03, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 02:21, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 02:21, 17 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Stubify or delete I came across this article when looking up some companies in the Category:Research and analysis firms. At most, this deserves a just stub, otherwise deletion may be appropriate. Cwobeel (talk) 03:55, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &#124;  Uncle Milty  &#124;  talk  &#124;  20:09, 23 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete as per nom. Purely promotional article with references that don't prove notability, merely existence. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:59, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.