Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Technology High School

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was keep since there was no consensus. I am surprised. Sjakkalle 08:32, 26 May 2005 (UTC)

Technology_High_School
Not much meaningful content, extremely poor wiki-practice in article


 * Delete. If the school in question turns out to be important enough and someone wants to contribute, "Technology High School" is hardly appropriate for the title of the page. Hardwick 16:38, 20 May 2005 (UTC)


 * delete does not establish notability --TimPope 16:52, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, maybe there is a technology high school out there that is notable, but this article isn't the way to write about it. --Sophitus 17:15, May 20, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, article has been improved a bit, needs expansion now--Sophitus 11:14, May 21, 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete under criterion #1: A sentence fragment is not an article.  (Space below provided for the usual group to come along without reading the article and swear that it's a great and vital piece of information because it has "school" in its name.)  Geogre 18:41, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. All schools are notable, and articles on them must be kept at all costs! Speedy delete as above. --Carnildo 20:30, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as above. Keep. All schools are notable, and articles on them must be kept at all costs! User:GRider/Schoolwatch Klonimus 22:04, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and continue to expand. Kappa 21:04, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
 * keep' please and expand too Yuckfoo 21:52, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
 * keep. Now a stub containing interesting info although would have supported deletion of substub. Capitalistroadster 00:32, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. There is nothing unique about this school. "Project-based learning" is not at all unusual. Rossami (talk) 00:35, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
 * delete = not notable. NoAccount 02:07, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
 * School looks like it might be notable, but the article is distinctly lacking in evidence, not to mention easily exceeding its bullshit quota. Withholding judgement for now. Chris talk back 02:43, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Useless collection of generic facts about an insignificant school. This is not an encyclopedia article. Individual schools are not inherently encyclopedic and there is nothing to distinguish insignificant schools like this one from thousands of nearly identical schools around the world. WP:NOT states "Wikipedia is not a general knowledge base, that is, it is not an indiscriminate collection of items of information. That something is 100% true does not mean it is suitable for inclusion in an encyclopedia." Gamaliel 04:52, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand, as with all short school articles. --Zantastik 06:06, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge/Redirect with Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified School District. &mdash; RJH 16:47, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, school. Grue 18:59, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep, valid school stub. &mdash;RaD Man (talk) 04:21, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Good cleanup. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 13:35, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. NPOV and verifiable. Good subject, article getting better with time. Schools belong here. --Unfocused 06:38, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge into Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified School District and delete - Skysmith 07:34, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. As is typical of a school stub, this one doesn't even clearly tell you where the school is, but instead makes you go to Sonoma State before you can tell even what country it's in. The three sentences in this article could be usefully merged into Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified School District. Quale 07:53, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep this stumpy little article Lupin 14:20, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand. If you have a problem with information not being included in the article, add it to the article, don't delete it.  Secondary schools are notable.   --BaronLarf 14:39, May 23, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Verifiable and NPOV. Double Blue  (Talk) 17:08, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails to meet Wikipedia's notability requirements. Jayjg (talk) 21:28, 25 May 2005 (UTC)
 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.