Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Technology economics


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. v/r - TP 00:45, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Technology economics

 * – ( View AfD View log )


 * Delete. Unreferenced article, probable original research, contested prod. WWGB (talk) 09:32, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. WWGB (talk) 09:39, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. WWGB (talk) 09:39, 11 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete this is easy. It's falls foul of WP:NEO, and reads like original research Ohconfucius  ¡digame! 13:59, 11 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Unreferenced, original research. Safiel (talk) 03:10, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Can't find anything in google scholar about "Technology economics". LK (talk) 07:06, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Unreferenced OR, on a topic too broad to be useful. Since mining, agriculture, and services all use technology, what would be outside this definition? -- 202.124.72.149 (talk) 11:52, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. The topic may be notable, but the literature doesn't appear to use that name -- I searched through pages of results at JSTOR without finding anything. I have no objection to recreation (at some appropriate title) if sources are used. CRGreathouse (t | c) 14:09, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.