Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tecnoesis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Barkeep49 (talk) 06:21, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Tecnoesis

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced advertisement/event listing. MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.) (talk) 14:05, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:37, 4 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment I have found that this nominator has AfDed 9 Articles, 7 PRODs and 6 CSDs. of articles in a particular Category:Technical festivals in India I strongly believe WP:BEFORE was not done despite being clearly advised to so on Helpdesk.-- D Big X ray ᗙ  12:15, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Perhaps you're not aware, but WP:ATTP have never carried much weight around here. If there was a problem with WP:BEFORE let the closing admin decide that, or alternatively just point to the sister-wiki, search for additional sources, etc. and post the results here if that provides evidence to keep. If you think a nominator has problems then address those elsewhere not by hounding the author across multiple AFDs. While it is true that an article written as an advertisement is not itself grounds for deletion but only for clean-up that was not the only reason given for the nomination, note the adjective "Unsourced". 2604:2000:8FC0:4:617F:E9A7:AF1C:4546 (talk) 16:28, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
 * FYI, nominating scores of article for deletion without WP:BEFORE is disruptive and can even lead to edit restrictions if continued. -- D Big X ray ᗙ  16:32, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Agree if true, but this is not the proper venue to address that issue. 2604:2000:8FC0:4:617F:E9A7:AF1C:4546 (talk) 16:36, 10 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete alternatively Draft/Userfy pending future notability. Per WP:NEVENT there needs to be diverse, in-depth, and persistent coverage. I reviewed the google books, news, scholar, and general search results. Even for the last only six pages of websites were listed and almost none of the coverage is independent and so the notability criteria are not met. Merging is sometimes an alternative but there isn't enough independent coverage here to warrant more than a sentence or two on the topic. Would be willing to strike and reconsider if new evidence shows that WP:NEVENT is met. 2604:2000:8FC0:4:617F:E9A7:AF1C:4546 (talk) 16:46, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete - The event might be notable, but the current article should go in the bit bucket. It reads like an advertisement, and has unreliable sources like Instagram and Facebook.  Robert McClenon (talk) 00:37, 12 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.