Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tectricians Consulting Services


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. -- ( drini's vandalproof page &#x260E;  ) 18:02, 26 November 2005 (UTC)

Tectricians Consulting Services
NN Company. - Mailer Diablo 20:01, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - advertising. ERcheck 20:08, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete incompetent spam (note that they can't even make up their minds what their name is, and at least one version is mis-spelled!) Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] (W) AfD? 20:16, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
 * this is not spam. it's a history of our company..give it a chance -rmitch5555- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rmitch5555 (talk • contribs) 2005-11-19 20:38:35 UTC
 * we just started the article it will have useful information.. again don't delete give it chance -rmitch5555- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rmitch5555 (talk • contribs) 2005-11-19 20:42:14 UTC
 * Comment: Check WP:CORP. - Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] (W) AfD? 21:08, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete although consluting is certainly what some consultants do.   Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  21:44, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
 * AGAIN, WE ARE NOT PROMOTING, it the history of our Company and what we do. The HTML mock up includes useful links within Wikipedia. Somewhat dissapointed about the mean spirited comments. I see similar articles.. we are not spammers — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rmitch5555 (talk • contribs) 2005-11-19 23:53:40 UTC
 * The article is a history of a company. It cites no sources, and research turns up no published histories of this company (indeed, no published works at all) written by people who are independent of the company.  The subject thus does not satisfy the WP:CORP criteria, for starters.  The company's own web site contains the same history, created by the same person (Rob Mitchell, whom the article tells us is the founder of the company), a scant few days before he submitted this article to Wikipedia.  This is an original history, being created from scratch by a single person, of himself and his company.  The article is autobiography, and has the common problems that autobiographies have of being original research and unverifiable.  Delete. Uncle G 04:26, 20 November 2005 (UTC)

The article is a work in progress. It is by no means complete. This is our first entry and prior to deletion. Lets us fix the article in accordance with Wikipedia standards.
 * Delete. Wikipedia is not a business directory.  A company should have some notability (e.g., publicly traded stock, well-known product, or news coverage) before it gets included. -- DS1953 05:39, 22 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.