Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ted Barnes (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to Clayhill. (non-admin closure) czar ♔   20:49, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Ted Barnes
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  (2nd_nomination) Stats )

Fails WP:BIO and WP:MUSIC (I think). All links seem to point to simple fact that he wrote 3 songs for Beth Orton, which seems to be only primary claim of notability, which I don't think is enough. scope_creep 22:37, 5 September 2014 (UTC)


 * As the nom created this on the first afd page - I've had to set up this page so apologies if i've messed anything up or missed anything off of here, – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  22:56, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment Second time nomination for delete. Now looking for a WP:SALT. scope_creep talk 11:29, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment -about the Ted Barnes article - I started it because I heard a couple of pieces on radio and thought them good, that's all  really - the presenter said he worked with beth Orton and  such and I thought  he sounded notable -I didn't realize there was an article  called Clayhill (when I first had the inspiration  I mean,  to create the article) either that covers much of the notable work - so if it is deleted I think that's probably right after all. I haven't quite the heart to vote delete however as I don't think the article is too utterly preposterous and undue to include on its own. Sayerslle (talk) 15:40, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Clayhill for now. That article doesn't really show much evidence of notability either, but if the band is notable, redirecting the members that are not individually notable thereto is reasonable. I'd also support a "delete and redirect" to clarify that we should not have an article on Barnes himself if something should happen to the Clayhill article. Huon (talk) 16:41, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:50, 7 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ks0stm  (T•C•G•E) 15:45, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 05:08, 20 September 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.