Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ted Cadsby


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 18:16, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Ted Cadsby

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Okay, now I've had time to look at this properly. Beyond articles written by the subject himself; social media/similar profiles; the subject's Youtube channel; and book listings in databases, and after removing the more dubious content based on such sources, I can't find any coverage amounting to WP:GNG. The fundamental COI/promotional tone issues are probably linked to this lack of acceptable sources. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 15:51, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:26, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:26, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete No WP:SIGCOV from reliable sources. OhNo itsJamie Talk 16:46, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:AUTHOR, from what I can tell, and the text is a copyvio from his own website. Wikipedia is not LinkedIn. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 15:11, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete No | As per my edits/comments to the page this morning, I think this page should be retained in its revised form, and the banner indicating paid contributions should be removed now that it is purely factual. Teritokyo (talk) 17:51, 15 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.