Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ted Grossbart


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 02:43, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Ted Grossbart

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional article whose subject does not meet WP:BIO or WP:PROF. Third-party sources are generally just passing mentions. Major parts of the content are solely based on Grossbart's own writings. Huon (talk) 00:44, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  Musa  Talk  03:38, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  Musa  Talk  03:39, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  Musa  Talk  03:40, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 15:34, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Probably delete - I can't find much to suggest his books or academic papers are particularly notable. Very little else to note. JMWt (talk) 21:03, 18 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Wrote one book for what appears to be a minor "books for patients" press. The sources listed are all name-checks/short quotes but one, and that one isn't about him but is an extended interview (well, 5-6 paragraphs) about the area of dermatology he is in. I don't find anything else, but there's also the issue that his name is pretty common. Doesn't meet wp:academic or wp:author, and I don't think he even meets wp:gng. LaMona (talk) 03:18, 19 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.