Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ted Halstead


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep (non-admin closure). Ruslik (talk) 08:48, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Ted Halstead

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)


 * Not notable enough for Wikipedia. Kingturtle (talk) 05:45, 16 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. Agreed.  Kingturtle sums it up. Bruno23 (talk) 18:35, 17 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Although it is difficult to contradict such comprehensive and incisive analysis as the above, I must demur on the basis of this subject's 235 Google News hits, several of which appear to lead to multiple instances of non-trivial coverage in such easily-dismissable sources as The Atlantic, The Washington Post. National Public Radio and The New York Times. Regretfully, and with due respect to the sterling research effort of the trigger-happy heroes, I move to facepalm keep. Skomorokh  01:59, 24 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tikiwont (talk) 14:08, 24 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep I think Skomorokh is correct. The 235 listings in the google news archive lead to a wealth of information to prove notability. The article needs to be expanded. AlbinoFerret (talk) 16:12, 24 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep I've expanded the article a bit based upon his bio, and with some more research anyone could lengthen this article considerably. tj9991 (talk | contribs) 18:04, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  00:46, 25 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.