Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ted Millstein


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Star  Mississippi  17:51, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

Ted Millstein

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Doubtful notability. I removed the "refs" that don't actually say anything about the subject, and that doesn't leave a whole lot. Pepper Beast   (talk)  16:18, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law and New York.   Pepper Beast    (talk)  16:18, 14 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete The article was promotional to begin with. City Life reporter Victor Fiorillo rightly questions why this local lawyer has a Wikipedia page. After the tax evasion sentence, it became embarrassing but, in my view, not necessarily notable. Deleting the article does Mr. Millstein a favor. The article should have been deleted long ago.
 * Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 03:21, 15 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.