Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ted Rogers School of Hospitality & Tourism Management


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect as a week has suggested nothing else (NAC). SwisterTwister  talk  22:39, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Ted Rogers School of Hospitality & Tourism Management

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable subschool of a school at a university. The school this subschool is part of is already redirected to the university. Had boldly redirected this but was reverted so here we are. Redirect to Ryerson University is a quite satisfactory outcome. John from Idegon (talk) 22:50, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:34, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:34, 6 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Redirect per nomination. No indication of notability per WP:GNG, sourced only by their own website, and all I can find about them online in WP:RS is passing mentions of them as a venue for seminars, or "X is a Professor of Y at Ted Rogers School of Hospitality & Tourism Management", with no substantial coverage of the School itself. OnionRing (talk) 06:09, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment - ? Would redirecting to Ryerson be a satisfactory outcome for you? That is what is usually done, as this is a valid search parameter. John from Idegon (talk) 07:39, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Sorry, yes of course it is. Redirect by all means. OnionRing (talk) 07:44, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Ryerson University. Mind  matrix  14:49, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Ryerson University There does not appear to be enough content to warrant a stand alone article. In fact the section in the main article almost exceeds the size of the sub article. Mkdw talk 17:45, 12 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.