Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ted Royer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 06:50, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Ted Royer

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This subject doesn't seem to meet the WP:BIO requirements for reliable independent coverage. My google news search didn't turn up anything but a passing mention. Article has been tagged for notability concerns for 7 months, it probably should go.  Kraftlos  (Talk | Contrib) 21:31, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 15:09, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:48, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:23, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Relisting comment. The article is a BLP so a second relist is reasonable. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:24, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't see evidence of substantial coverage in reliable sources and if there is any notability I would say it's marginal based on the write up (which is pretty promotional). ChildofMidnight (talk) 04:09, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.