Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ted Sexton


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:26, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

Ted Sexton

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:NPOL. Also might be an WP:AUTOBIO GPL93 (talk) 22:34, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:55, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:59, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. North America1000 12:01, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. North America1000 12:01, 30 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete Appears to fail WP:NPOL as an elected Tuscaloosa County county sheriff. The community has not presumed inherent notability for this position. --Enos733 (talk) 04:56, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. County sheriffs are not handed an automatic presumption of notability per WP:NPOL just because they exist — but this is written more like a résumé than an encyclopedia article, and is far too dependent on primary sources rather than notability-supporting reliable sources that would help get him over WP:GNG. Bearcat (talk) 18:43, 4 February 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.