Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tedd Koren


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Septrillion (talk) 13:05, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Tedd Koren

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Lacks significant coverage from reliable secondary sources. I have been asked to do this by. Septrillion (talk) 22:24, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep Septrillion (talk) 13:05, 30 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Weak keep, since I created the page. Others can decide if it is kept, deleted or merged. But I have to admit it appears to lack significant coverage. There is some coverage. It could be kept or merged to Chiropractic treatment techniques. QuackGuru ( talk ) 03:09, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I have edited your comment to ensure that your !vote is counted by the AfD stats tool. Septrillion (talk) 03:24, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 10:52, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 10:52, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 10:52, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 10:52, 27 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Weak keep for the reasons QuackGuru listed. There seems to be a decent amount of sources which mention him, but most are not as in-depth as I would like. I'll go through the sources and see if the page can be improved in any way. S EMMENDINGER  ( talk ) 13:32, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Added some information, I will say there is a LOT of information on HighBeam but I do not have a subscription to that site. S EMMENDINGER  ( talk ) 14:30, 27 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep per above. Meets GNG with the sources, plus the hard to reach ones on HighBeam. ~ EDDY  ( talk / contribs ) ~ 19:14, 29 April 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.