Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teddy Together


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was : Keep - Nomination withdrawn. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 18:38, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Teddy Together

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Nintendo game released this year, no third-party references, fails to establish notability. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 15:39, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:38, 6 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep - "No third-party references" is objectively false, it has received dedicated coverage from reliable sources (reliable per consensus at the WikiProject level.)
 * 1) http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2016-05-26-one-of-japans-most-terrifying-3ds-games-is-being-localised-for-the-uk
 * 2) http://www.kotaku.co.uk/2016/05/26/teddy-together-sees-a-sentient-bear-invade-your-3ds
 * 3) http://www.nintendolife.com/reviews/3ds-eshop/teddy_together_3ds
 * 4) http://www.siliconera.com/2016/05/24/teddy-together-localization-kuma-tomo/
 * 5) http://www.nintendolife.com/news/2016/05/teddy_together_promises_kid-friendly_confidence_building_on_3ds
 * 6) http://www.nintendolife.com/news/2016/07/video_nintendo_begins_pushing_teddy_together_on_uk_childrens_television
 * 7) http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/news/42736/teddy-together-announced-for-europe-australia
 * Worst case scenario would be to redirect to the List of 3DS games, but I'm working on rewriting and formatting the article so I'm going with "keep" for now. Sergecross73   msg me  15:40, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment - Sources also reported that it was the 5th best-selling video game in the country during its release week in Japan. Sergecross73   msg me  16:25, 6 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment - The article has been completely rewritten entirely according to third party sources, and expanded out of stub-status. Please look it over prior to giving your stance here. Thanks. Sergecross73   msg me  17:14, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: The article was originally nominated for speedy deletion under the criterion WP:CSD, which obviously didn't apply (the article perfectly identified its subject); I have converted the nomination to regular deletion. I see that the article has been expanded and third-party references were added; unless something unexpected happens, I'll probably withdraw the nomination in a day or so. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 19:00, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep, seems WP:BEFORE wasn't completely followed here  Satellizer el Bridget (Talk)  11:15, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep per the sources provided by Sergecross73 above. AdrianGamer (talk) 11:28, 7 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.