Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tee Ali Arabmoney


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 13:23, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Tee Ali Arabmoney

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable individual lacking in-depth, non-trivial support. References are unrelated, do not mention subject, or are press releases. red dogsix (talk) 05:28, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:20, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:21, 23 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep Passes Notability. NANExcella (talk) 11:56, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment - Please indicate how the individual meets the WP:N criteria. The individual lacks in-depth, non-trivial support.  The "References" are single  line mentions at best and the award was for his models, not the individual.  This is far from a notable individual and smacks of advertising.  red dogsix (talk) 02:37, 25 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep The subject has good and reliable resources such as The Sun (United Kingdom), SoundCloud and The Philadelphia Inquirer. His notability also justifies from NEL and Afro Model Awards. Entradakoi (talk) 02:09, 25 July 2018 (UTC) — Note to closing admin: Entradakoi (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this XfD.
 * Comment - The "references" are hardly adequate, the Sun and Philly items are single line items. The individual lacks in-depth, non-trivial support.  The "References" are single line mentions at best and the award was for his models, not the individual.  This is far from a notable individual and smacks of advertising.  red dogsix (talk) 02:37, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Unnecessary repeating his comment while subject is notable and have reliable resources. Entradakoi (talk) 06:01, 28 July 2018 (UTC) — Note to closing admin: Entradakoi (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this XfD.

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete. Not notable. Doesn't meet WP:GNG. No significant coverage from reliable sources. All cited articles are passing mentions or sources affiliated with the person. —  Newslinger  talk   17:40, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Regarding the 2014 Nigeria Entertainment Awards, I can't find any source listing the person as a winner of the "Best Nigerian Modelling Agency in the UK" award, and I doubt this award is significant enough for WP:ANYBIO. —  Newslinger  talk   17:45, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Removed award claim from both this article and the Nigeria Entertainment Awards article. There's no evidence that this award even exists. —  Newslinger  talk   16:15, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note that the page creator,, previously created the Tee Ali article, which was speedy deleted under WP:G11. —  Newslinger  talk   16:23, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Atlantic306 (talk) 18:56, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. —  Newslinger   talk   20:56, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —  Newslinger   talk   20:56, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. —  Newslinger   talk   20:56, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: I'm going to relist this again, but could both sides (though especially the !Keep voters) please provide justifications in their !votes
 * Delete nothing near the level of references we need to show that GNG is passed.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:38, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Passes Notability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonnycraig888 (talk • contribs) — Jonnycraig888 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 09:22, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Here are the sources in the article and why they don't meet WP:GNG:
 * The Sun: Not significant coverage. Passing mention. Article is about someone else.
 * SoundCloud: Not independent. Listings of person's music.
 * Philly.com: Not significant. Passing mention. Article is about someone else.
 * Women4Africa Blog: Not significant or reliable: Blog post with passing mention.
 * Dailymotion: Not significant or independent. Video showing people affiliated with person.
 * BellaNaija: Not significant or reliable. Blog post that doesn't even mention the person.
 * YouTube: Not significant or independent. Video showing people affiliated with person.
 * Afro Model Awards: Not significant. Award listing for Afro Model Awards, an award that isn't prestigious enough to confer notability on the person.
 * Sources not cited in the article are no better. —  Newslinger  talk   23:56, 6 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete. the sources are mostly listings, and not al lthe material is verifiable.  DGG ( talk ) 20:53, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment just mentioning that The Sun is definitely not a reliable source, it's a tabloid of the worst type with a reputation well below the Daily Mail, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 19:38, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Added to WP:RS/P. —  Newslinger  talk   21:45, 9 August 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.