Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teejay Karthi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 16:28, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Teejay Karthi

 * – ( View AfD View log )

PROD concern was ''Lacks coverage required for WP:BASIC and his role in the film industry does not make him inherently notable. Borderline WP:A7.''. Removed without explanation.

Supposedly a notable director but I can't find any reliable evidence. None of the five references used mention him even once. Even his IMDb page is completely empty! Spiderone 16:02, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  16:02, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  16:02, 5 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete Not a single cited sources has even a passing mention. This should have been CSD instead. Creator's name uncannily similar. Looks like a vanity article to me. RationalPuff (talk) 16:15, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Kolma8 (talk) 17:40, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedily Delete vanity article and a poorly written one at that. I assume somewhere exists a notable poster designer but this is not the day I read about one.Slywriter (talk) 01:55, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete A7. None of the sources in the article mention him and the only results my searches turned up were his own social media. He's described on his social media as a poster designer, and I can find no evidence that he has ever directed or screen written a movie, as the article claims. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 12:25, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Someone tagged the article for speedy deletion per G3. Presumably this has to do with the incredible claims that failed verification. –LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄ ) 10:45, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete G3, G4 and A7 Since every claim is tagged either that it requires verification or that the reference given does not support the claim, this should be deleted per WP:BLP. I concur with above contributors, that none of the claims can be verified from any other available sources. 86.142.79.215 (talk) 13:36, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete No reliable sources supporting the article provided. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 17:45, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: utter spam and totally non-notable.  Java Hurricane  11:03, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:GNG. In theory, a poster designer or publicist could become notable, but not this person. Bearian (talk) 21:03, 11 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.