Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teel James Glenn


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:30, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

Teel James Glenn

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

This person does not meet our notability requirements for people. There are no sources to indicate significant coverage of this person and I am unable to find any myself. SmartSE (talk) 14:51, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment The article appears to be a COI, but given his resume there might be sources out there; here's a link to an article in the New York Post: . Also, , . This might do the trick, but the article will still need massive clean up to meet guidelines. JNW (talk) 15:09, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Oops, managed to miss those somehow when I was checking for sources pre-nom. Personally, I'd say that they still don't demonstrate significant coverage as they are about the stunt school, rather than him. SmartSE (talk) 16:10, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
 * True, though the mentions within the articles are significant. My take is that if all the chaff were cut and the article trimmed to content provided by these sources it might have a chance. Thanks for your attention to this and the related article . JNW (talk) 16:17, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Not so sure, there's not more than a couple of sentences about him in any of them, but I think I may have higher standards than most for inclusion. Would do more, but I think problems with DYK are more pressing. SmartSE (talk) 16:33, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:55, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 01:01, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete - lacks significant coverage. Racepacket (talk) 02:43, 14 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete per SmartSE. Some coverage in passing -- but either as an employee of a perhaps-notable fight school or as a sort of "community notice" article.  Neither strikes me as significant enough to support an article.  --TheOtherBob 04:47, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.