Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teen Assassin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete. Eluchil404 (talk) 06:42, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Teen Assassin

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable book, does not meet any criteria at WP:BOOK Buggie111 (talk) 03:48, 24 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. I agree, non-notable, and not a well written article.--Axel™ (talk) 04:22, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Gbooks shows zero reviews. Puny, mostly primary or sales sites from a general search. The author did get a cute little piece in a Brisbane paper, but I think it actually provides the most damning evidence: "Now 17, Sean worked part-time at a local supermarket to raise $4000 to have Teen Assassin edited and self-published earlier this year after several unsuccessful approaches to publishers. The original print run sold out, and Sean last week printed another 100 copies of the action-thriller..." Fails WP:GNG. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 05:00, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete – the book may become notable in the future. But for now, it fails Notability_(books) and the article doesn't even have a single reference. -- Bryce   Wilson  &#124;  talk   05:50, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unsourced article, non notable, the book is self-published and there are no reviews except for the quoted passage from the Brisbane Courier Mail. Might become notable in future, but at the moment it definitely fails WP:N. McMarcoP (talk) 10:50, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 21:35, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  —Grahame (talk) 00:26, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.