Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teen Bayka Fajiti Aika


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 22:48, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

Teen Bayka Fajiti Aika

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Appears to fail WP:NFILM. One review found,, but not sure if it is a reliable source. In any case, films need 2 reviews to pass notability. All other citations are film database sites or links to actors in film or routine announcements. Donald D23  talk to me  16:28, 10 December 2022 (UTC) Already PROD'd, not eligible for Soft Deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 18:47, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India.  Donald D23   talk to me  16:28, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment: The review is from Daily News and Analysis which was a newspaper published by Zee Media Corporation so it can be reliable but I can't found any other review except from DNA News. ​​​​​​​𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️Let's Talk ! 10:49, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep. Two review Sakal and Pudhari.
 * AShiv1212 (talk) 05:14, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

*Delete. A single review is insufficient to pass WP:GNG or WP:NFILM. I also found this but it has little editorial policies to demonstrate that it is a WP:RS, so I am at delete.  VickKiang  (talk)  02:13, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep as three reliable sources reviews have now been identified in this discussion enabling a pass of WP:GNG so that deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 22:16, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep per the additional refs found. Of the total three reviews, two are WP:RS newspapers that meet WP:NEWSORG and another is potentially RS due to publication by Daily News and Analysis, so overall IMO WP:GNG is weakly passed.  VickKiang   (talk)  04:37, 21 December 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.