Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles (2003 TV series) - allusions to other series


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 13:07, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles (2003 TV series) - allusions to other series

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Extreme case of original research. Consists of observations that some editors believe is a reference to to something else in another Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles series. Unreferenced and unverifiable, and mostly subjective. Saikokira 00:07, 15 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. Right away. Jobjörn  (Talk ° contribs) 00:25, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Even quicker than the above. There should be a speedy category for this sort of article. Shame WP:BOLLOCKS doesn't apply to CSD.  Eliminator JR   Talk  00:32, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - I hate "references", "in popular culture" pages, because they are nearly always full of unverifiable OR that is unattributable. This is no exception.  --Haemo 00:58, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I hate them too, pal. Jobjörn  (Talk ° contribs) 01:09, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Yes, OR. Alex43223T 01:13, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Resolute 04:37, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. A list of concepts in the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles cartoon which previously appeared in other TMNT comic books, cartoons, or movies is not worth including in a general encyclopedia. --Metropolitan90 06:26, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not an informative article. Kind of obscure. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Padawan3000 (talk • contribs) 07:23, 15 March 2007 (UTC).
 * Delete A lot of work obviously went into this article, but really, it's unnecessary. I feel bad AFD'ing an article that's this large and has been around 13 months, but, it's a totally useless article. Delete. J&#39;onn J&#39;onzz 15:28, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete per nom. &mdash; Whedonette (ping) 16:11, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as WP:OR &#8212;SparklingWiggleGet a job! 20:42, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as trivial material about fiction.-- danntm T C 22:34, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete - An indiscriminate list, and a lot of original research. -- Chairman S. Talk  Contribs  22:43, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. A list that compares something it itself?  No, really, of course there's gonna be similarities between different incarnations of the same series.  Sheesh.--UsaSatsui 00:58, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 *  Strong  delete. The epitome of what's wrong with nearly all "pop culture references" lists, WP:OR and WP:NOT by the boatload. Krimpet 01:08, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Aww, come on now, who disabled the blink tag? Krimpet 01:11, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure, but I thank them. Blinking text stopped being cool about 5 seconds after the internet went active.  --UsaSatsui 01:32, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Nuh-uh! Blinking text lives forever dudes... ;) -- Spawn Man
 * Keep. Just because it's not useful to you doesn't mean it's not interesting and informative. We're not a big boy encyclopedia, this is to give as much information created by users as possible. This accomplishes it. - pokemaniacbill
 * Delete - This article confuses me! What the heck is it about? It simply makes no sense & I'm surprised that an admin hasn't closed this discussion already. C'mon, there's only one keep & that's from a person who refers to Wikipedia as a "Big boy encyclopedia" - need I say more? Delete outright, flame & salt & then stomp on the little itty pieces & cast them into the ocean. Go turtles! Yay! Spawn Man 09:36, 20 March 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.