Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teenybopper/2005-04-03

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. Rossami (talk) 05:36, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Teenybopper
This page is nonsense. It was created by User:Staplertime who who has already been warned about vandalism (don't know if it was for this). It has no potential to become encyclopedic and was only created to disrupt. Plus, it already has a definition in the Wiktionary. Delete.

This is in the article: "OMGZZZ I GOT DIZ RLLY PURTY SHURT FRUM LTD2 IT SEZ 90% ANGEL ON IT!!!!one!!!!!" --Dmcdevit 21:25, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Remove the crap and its a dicdef. Maybe an encyclopedia article can be written on this (though one could say that much about basically any word or term) but if so start from scratch. -R. fiend 21:29, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - remove the crap and it's a dicdef that has already been moved to Wiktionary. Agree with R. fiend about starting over. -- Cyrius|&#9998; 21:36, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete this, but I dispute the notion that there's no way for it to become encyclopedic. Hopefully, someone will rescue this. Meelar (talk) 01:56, Mar 23, 2005 (UTC)
 * If it can be made more than a dictionary definition, then it can become encyclopedic--Dmcdevit 02:29, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, un-encyclopaedic, dictionary definition. Megan1967 05:26, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Uh, what...? There's possibility for making this term into a real article, but there isn't anything here to work with.  Delete to blow this out of the edit history so someone can take a real stab at this. - Lucky 6.9 07:36, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Dicdef by someone who has not grasped the style of an encyclopedia. Average Earthman 09:24, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. There is a link already to Wiktionary. Zscout370 14:26, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Complete rubbish.  Wikipedia is neither a dictionary or an outlet for juvenille ramblings. Zerbey 19:13, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to adolescence. FYI, Teenager already redirects there.  -Sean Curtin 02:00, Mar 26, 2005 (UTC)
 * I agree with Sean Curtin.
 * Delete Pavel Vozenilek 18:05, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * transwiki. Sean, what you don't realize is that "teenybopper" has a very different context than "teenager" -- as any teenager will tell you (and no, thank you, I'm almost 30). Avriette 00:45, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Change to delete. possible redirect to teenager, but I think that's unfair. note, this article exists in the wiktionary. Avriette 00:46, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.