Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teeranun Chiangta


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:21, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Teeranun Chiangta

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

PROD objected, reason was there were some achievements. However the achievements does not even pass NBAD; fails GNG and BASIC too. No coverage about him found. Timothytyy (talk) 00:08, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Badminton,  and Thailand. Timothytyy (talk) 00:08, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete or Move to draft No significant coverage found. I can't find any reliable, secondary sources that don't just pass mention about this person. The person who loves reading (talk) 03:11, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep just because WP:NBAD doesn't include it, it doesn't mean twice medalist at the Southeast Asian Games will not have merit to have an article. I believe it should be kept as per. zoglophie 04:58, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep two medals in Southeast Asian Games. He reached third round at the Olympics. Stvbastian (talk) 08:06, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Olympics-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:31, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - according to de.wiki his name in Thai is ธีรนันท์ เชียงทา but I'm getting no decent results when searching. If he fails WP:NBAD, WP:NOLY, WP:SPORTBASIC and WP:GNG, which nobody seems to be disputing, then I don't see any guideline-centred reason for keeping this. Maybe redirect to Badminton at the 1992 Summer Olympics – Men's singles at best.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:37, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

1keyhole (talk) 04:42, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete fails to meet the notability requirements in WP:GNG
 * Keep Two medals in Southeast Asian Games. He reached third round at the Olympics. Florentyna (talk) 17:35, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
 * None of which has relevance to WP:NBAD, WP:NOLY, WP:SPORTBASIC and WP:GNG Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:58, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 00:32, 26 April 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Modussiccandi (talk) 11:51, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak keep I am personally convinced that this person would meet GNG if there was more internet reporting on badminton in Thailand in the early 90s... the argument I present is that the Western bias in sourcing and achievement requirements is probably at play and we should at least revisit those past discussion proposals of allowing more wiggle room for non-Western and historic subjects in some areas. Kingsif (talk) 22:31, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete Clearly fails GNG and I would be more inclined to keep if I could find more than 1 source on the wiki page. I cannot analyze only 1 source. Nagol0929 (talk) 12:24, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Also this blatantly fails WP:SPORTBASIC #5 Sports biographies must include at least one reference to a source providing significant coverage of the subject, excluding database sources. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:22, 12 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete Could not find many sources for him.  Heart  (talk) 00:47, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Lacks in-depth coverage to meet WP:NBIO. MrsSnoozyTurtle 00:48, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete I tried look for material in Thai and English and couldn't find anything.  Dr vulpes  (💬 • 📝) 05:56, 13 May 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.