Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teezio


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 19:40, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Teezio

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Notability is lacking as there are zero reliable sources able to be found regarding this individual (after a WP:BASIC search). The article is clearly promotional and written by a friend of his (in violation of WP:COI/WP:DISCLOSE). I tried to advise them this article would not work for this encyclopedia with the lack of notability, and put the article up for PROD, but they removed that so now we're here. — Coffee  //  have a ☕️ //  beans  // 19:35, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —  Coffee  //  have a ☕️ //  beans  // 19:35, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —  Coffee  //  have a ☕️ //  beans  // 19:35, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:25, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:25, 14 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete falls far short of our notability guidelines. I was going to nominate this myself tonight and was keeping an eye on it, but Coffee beat me to it. Along the same lines as the prod removal, I removed puffery earlier today and it was also reinstated without explanation. — The SandDoctor Talk 20:27, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:NMUSIC and basically any other notability check as there are no secondary sources where the subject is the main topic. All the sources provided are Youtube videos and producer directories. I couldn't find a single reliable source that would warrant this person an article on Wikipedia. --MewMeowth (talk) 20:50, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete – doesn't meet WP:GNG. I don't think sound engineers are covered by WP:NMUSIC – maybe WP:CREATIVE?  In any case, it is very clear that there is no notability here; being associated with a notable person does not make that person's notability rub off, and the same thing applies to being part of the crew for a charting song. The song might be notable per WP:NMUSIC but all people who worked on it, other than the artist, don't autumatically become notable. --bonadea contributions talk 21:16, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Unable to find sources, other than social media platforms, that show notability. Does not meet WP:GNG and fails WP:BASIC. -AuthorAuthor (talk) 01:45, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - I originally put this up for g12 speedy, since it was a copyvio. That had been removed, but I was watching it for a day or two, and like SandDoctor, was going to nominate this myself.  Fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. The article asserts that he was nominated for both a Grammy and a Latin Grammy, and if true, they would definitely meet meet MUSICBIO, but the claims in the article are uncited (well, one is cited, but the reference does not support the assertion), and I can find no record him at either the Grammy or Latin Grammy database. Onel 5969  TT me 12:48, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - No better sourcing found. Article creator isn't helping his cause by being disruptive elsewhere.  --Finngall talk  15:57, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, fails WP:GNG -- Devoke water  (talk)  15:19, 19 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.