Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tegen Roberts


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. No prejudice towards a redirect. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:30, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Tegen Roberts

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

All of the news coverage I found only covered this one event. Thus as far as I can tell, she is notable only for winning money on a game show. The current bio doesn't indicate any other reasons for continued notability. Per notability-for-one-event WP:1E, we don't need this article. Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 04:35, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:1E. The article feels like a social network page and there is no lasting notability.  Lugnuts  Dick Laurent is dead 07:09, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - from what I can tell, her second event is being the second most followed contestant behind Olly Murs, which the article cites (albeit dubiously), and possibly Naughty Boy, as he was also on the show. All it needs is a few more references; if it can't be sourced, just convert it into a paragraph on Deal or No Deal (UK).-- Laun  chba  ller  09:03, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect Might merit a sentence in Deal or No Deal (UK game show), which already mentions her briefly as well as other contestants who attracted media interest. But she's not really notable: having got a few Twitter followers off the back of her TV appearance isn't really a separate event from the TV appearance (her twitter success hasn't attracted wide media attention separate from her TV appearance, and being popular on Twitter/Facebook/YouTube/etc isn't in itself grounds for notability, as I think many past AfDs will show). --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:21, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Sir  Rcsprinter,  Bt  (banter)  @ 12:27, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. Sir  Rcsprinter,  Bt  (speak)  @ 12:27, 30 May 2013 (UTC)


 * comment from nom I'd be fine with a redirect also if consensus goes that way. --Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 13:24, 30 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete or Merge with Deal or No Deal (UK game show)- Per WP:1E it is not a notable enough event to warrant its own article. It is not the most anyone has won on a UK gameshow, and she is not the only one to win a large amount on that particular show. I can't see how being the second most followed contestant makes her notable either.Sarahj2107 (talk) 14:51, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete -- possibly after adding something to the article on the show. This might have a list of big money winners.  Peterkingiron (talk) 15:00, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:35, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:35, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

*Delete without redirect. BLP1E applies. A jump in Twitter followers? seriously? Niteshift36 (talk) 15:05, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Deal or No Deal (UK game show), where she is mentioned. I agree that the article doesn't make any particularly great claims to notability at the moment, and there's little sign that her media attention has been enduring. Robofish (talk) 17:48, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.