Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tegernseer Landstraße


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ben · Salvidrim!   &#9993;  18:38, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Tegernseer Landstraße

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Questionable notability per WP:NTSR; web pages that mention this street are in mostly in German so I cannot tell if the coverage is substantial or trivial. Enwebb (talk) 05:13, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 05:22, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 08:08, 13 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment To translate " "Unsere Tela“ ist ein Projekt zur Geschichte der Tegernseer Landstraße in Giesing" = "Unseren Tela" is a project documenting the history of the Tegernseer Landstraße in Giesing so there's an entire project dedicated to documenting the history of this street, which to me is unheard of but people have different hobbies. I would suggest going through Unsere Tela and look for the sources they use and then find them, I can speak and read German but I'm too busy to look for them but I would suggest anyone with an interest in this street to do so. --Donald Trung (Talk) (Articles) Respect mobile users. 09:24, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - This appears a main artery in Munich. An entire chapter in the book Architektur in München 1933-1945: ein Stadtführer is dedicated to it about the development of it during the Nazi era.  The Münchner Merkur has an in-depth coverage of it.--Oakshade (talk) 17:19, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment - I just added sources and footnotes to a couple of statements in the article. One source backs up a lot of statements and addresses the topic directly and in detail (maybe still not enough to make it notable; there are still unsourced statements left that couldn't be sourced with the online references i found). There probably is additional information availabe in offline sources.  Nyamo Kurosawa (talk) 17:59, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - GNG applies. Also it is a named section of the B2R and the E54, as such a standalone article could be argued on their notability. The street is subject to historical analysis and exhibitions produced - see http://histbav.hypotheses.org/4859 Agathoclea (talk) 12:53, 20 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.