Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teh Chou Tzou


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mgm|(talk) 10:44, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Teh Chou Tzou

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The subject does not appear to meet the notability criteria for athletes. One of the references does not appear to mention the subject, while the other two link to Facebook. A Google and Google News search for his name finds nothing. The Seoul International School page lists him as a notable alumni ("a professional body builder") but I was unable to find any sources that verify this.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 22:59, 21 January 2009 (UTC) 
 * Delete: Entirely unsourced BLP. First source doesn't seem to mention him, and Facebook profile != source.  Ever. David(Talk) 23:29, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  00:23, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  00:23, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:59, 25 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Strong delete - The assertion that he qualified for the finals of a competitions is not backed up by the source to which it is ref'd; in fact the source doesn't mention this guy at all. Zero Google news hits ever, and an ordinary google search provides no hits for the name whatsoever. The other references are to facebook of all places, and the guy in the profile photo doesn't look too much like a pro bodybuilder from what I can see. This looks like a hoax to me, and if not that, then at the very least he doesn't seem to meet our verifiability (or notability) guidelines. This needs to go. – Toon (talk)  00:41, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Utmost Delete Not only does it read like an advert, there again are no sources to back up the claims made.--EmperorofPeopleEverywhere (talk) 02:26, 26 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.