Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tehseen Fawad


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Meets WP:POLITICIAN. Somewhat meets WP:SKCRIT #3 as has reliable sources indicating that she meets WP:POLITICIAN (one being a listing on an official Pakistani government website, stating that they are a member of the assembly). Please do WP:BEFORE before nominating pages for deletion. Please also note that sources do not have to be online, offline sources (ie books, newspapers etc) are perfectly acceptable.

With that said, the article does need improvement, just not deletion. (non-admin closure) TheSandDoctor (talk) 05:44, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Tehseen Fawad

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Tehseen is not notable. Not many references on the internet. Spasage (talk) 15:38, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 15:45, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 15:45, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 15:45, 7 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep, as a Provincial Assembly Member since 2013, she meets WP:POLITICIAN, despite the thin press coverage. The Mighty Glen (talk) 15:46, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2018 March 7.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 15:55, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Procedural Keep Unfortunately, it's a retaliatory nomination after being bitten by 1 and 2. I am not blaming the nom, maybe they got distressed after their stubs were AfDed and they AfDed it on similar rationale.  samee  talk 16:32, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, the nominator took my AfDs personally. I never meant to offend anyone. --Saqib (talk) 17:03, 7 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep So let's 'keep' all deserving articles created by both of you. I'll try to chip in my share and expand with new references, wherever I can. Ngrewal1 (talk) 23:50, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep -- This is a clear-cut case. This person meets WP:NPOL by being a member of the Provincial Assembly of the Punjab, which is a provincial legislature.  Should never have been nominated for deletion. 192.160.216.52 (talk) 18:00, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. Serving in a provincial or state legislature is a clean pass of WP:NPOL #1. Certainly the article needs improvement, but as long as we can properly verify that a person actually held the role they're claimed to have held (as opposed to being an outright WP:HOAX), people at this level of inherent notability are kept and just flagged for refimprove. Also I'm willing to bet that the nominator just searched for English sources, which would obviously be sparse, and didn't invest the same amount of energy into searching for the Urdu sources that would be much more likely available — and, for that matter, we don't require all of our sources to be online ones either: if there are newspapers in the Punjab that cover provincial politics but don't have websites, they're still perfectly valid sources. Bearcat (talk) 18:15, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep As a member of a provincial / state legislature, with the requisite reliable and verifiable sources to back it up, notability is met. If this is indeed a retaliatory nomination, Samee, you have my sympathies; I've been dealing with the same problem myself. Alansohn (talk) 21:35, 7 March 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.