Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teiosha George


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted. (Non-admin closure) --MelanieN (talk) 17:18, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Teiosha George

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

College basketball player; never played professionally; does not meet Wikipedia's standards for inclusion. PROD was removed without comment by article's author. MelanieN (talk) 05:16, 24 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete – per WP:NBASKETBALL, did play professionally but in a very low German league in 2008–09 . The only thing notable about her is that she is the sister of Paul George. DaHuzyBru (talk) 07:16, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment FYI, this article has been speedy deleted already about a week ago. It was created by the same person under a different user name without references. This person/user has been been a problem lately with sock puppetry, so no wonder he/she removed the PROD without comment. DaHuzyBru (talk) 07:19, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. — Mike  moral  ♪♫  09:49, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. — Mike  moral  ♪♫  09:49, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. — Mike  moral  ♪♫  09:49, 24 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails GNG and NBASKETBALL. Rikster2 (talk) 20:47, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per GNG. Bring the sibling of someone notable does not confer inherent notability on the person in question. Jrcla2 (talk) 13:13, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Procedural note The article has been deleted under the WP:CSD as it was created by a sock account in violation of their block.--Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 15:44, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.