Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tej Singh


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Per WP:SKCRIT iii (and WP:ATA on the side). (non-admin closure) —SerialNumber54129  paranoia / cheap sh*t room 12:24, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Tej Singh

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Person does not appear to be notable at all, with almost no content describing why he might have any relevance. EggRoll97 (talk) 03:06, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions.  Kpgj  hpjm  05:21, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Kpgj  hpjm  05:21, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion -related deletion discussions.  Kpgj  hpjm  05:23, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

*Delete: Non-notable and too less content. Kpgj hpjm  05:24, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Care to explain what makes you think non notable ? Too less content is a reason to expand and not to delete. -- D Big X ray   19:47, 22 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep per WP:MILPERSON. Both nom and the editor above have failed to explain the policy and any strong reason to delete. The Subject is perfectly notable and is widely popular in Sikh History and literature. To summarize his Bio, this Sikh general is considered a villian as his treachery led to the defeat of Sikh army. The Search term should be "Tej Singh Anglo Sikh War" And the person is also mentioned as "Teja Singh" in some historical literature. The subject is a military commander with Notable history And the stub can easily be expanded. Being a top level General (the commander-in-chief) of the Sikh Army the subject passes WP:MILPERSON. Now as far as WP:GNG is concerned, please check the sources here   . -- D Big X ray   19:45, 22 July 2018 (UTC)


 * -- D Big X ray  19:45, 22 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep: As per DBigXray, Switching to keep as I have gone through the refs which show a lot of notability . Kpgj  hpjm  01:57, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Passes WP:GNG. Sources mentioned by DBigXray are reliable. Accesscrawl (talk) 04:14, 23 July 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.