Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tejinder Singh


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:26, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Tejinder Singh

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article shows he was nominated for an award. That passes CSD. There are references. That passes BLPPROD. The other references seem to be written by him, not about him. This is just the gentleman doing his job. There is insufficient notability here. The gentleman fails WP:GNG. Fiddle  Faddle  19:19, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:39, 30 August 2013 (UTC) Note: Please consider reading WP:INDAFD which includes some points about WikiProject India AFDs. Those may or may not be applicable here. Tito ☸ Dutta 23:10, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:40, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:40, 30 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment not sure this still live. the article was detagged. Dloh cierekim  23:44, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * ( Non administrator WikiProject India editor's observation ) Added back, the AFD nomination is neither withdrawn nor closed, m/ User:Timtrent. -- Tito ☸ Dutta 00:01, 31 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Note I have just been through the alleged references, and many of them do not pass muster. The gentleman certainly exists and is a journalist. The rest of the article puffs him up to be that which he is not. The AfD banner has now been removed by '2' editors and a sockpuppetry report has been made. One of them has stated that he is not Tejinder Sigh on the article's talk page. Lady MacBeth srpings to mind here. No-one has suggested they were, previously! Fiddle   Faddle  19:19, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Well of course they aren't! Dloh  cierekim  20:25, 31 August 2013 (UTC)


 * delete Significant and living, but does not meet WP:GNG Dloh  cierekim  20:27, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:25, 7 September 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.